Celebrating the dog

Published Saturday July 4th, 2009
E10

The list of ways dogs have helped humans throughout history is almost endless.

They've guarded livestock, herded sheep, driven cattle and protected human dwellings from castles to condos. Dogs assist people with disabilities, sniff out illegal drugs and find food from birds to truffles.

From detecting heart attacks and seizures before they happen to drag drowning people to safety, it's hard to imagine any form of technology that could surpass the uncountable number of ways in which dogs lend us a helping paw.

In selectively breeding dogs for the skills that helped them help us, human beings have changed the dog both inside and out.

Today, there are hundreds of dog breeds so different from each other in type that it's hard to believe they're members of the same species - and yet, each of these dogs' forms grew out of a specific function.

"If people hadn't changed the dog to do certain tasks, he'd look very much like the dingo," said Heather Russell- Revesz, co-author of the World Atlas of Dog Breeds.

"Whether it was making a dog shorterlegged or faster, so he could catch a specific kind of prey, or making him tiny enough to sit on your lap, human intervention has brought an incredible diversity of type to the dog."

Not all the changes were about function. For example, when it became clear how easily the dog's physical appearance could be changed by human breeding choices, dog breeders in Victorian England became interested in seeing just how extreme those changes could be.

"Look at the bulldog," said Russell-Revesz. "He's about as different from a 'natural breed' like the dingo as a dog can be. His face is flat; his legs are short and bowed.

Another example is the field spaniel. The Victorians took a functional hunting dog and started breeding him smaller and smaller, until his legs were so short he could hardly walk, let alone hunt.

He very nearly became extinct, until fanciers in the 1930s began to select for a less extreme dog.

Basics such as breathing and walking aside, even dogs originally developed to help humans in hunting, farm chores or family protection are increasingly out of a job in modern times.

World War II threatened the existence of many dog breeds, because it was impossible to continue breeding or even feeding dogs during the war, and afterward, because human lifestyles changed profoundly in the post-war era.

"Many dog breeds were wiped out, and others were on the brink of extinction," Russell-Revesz said.

"Their traditional work was largely obsolete, and it was only the extraordinary dedication of a few individuals that preserved the amazing legacy of traditional dog breeds."

Of course, not all canine work is obsolete.

Dogs today are being bred for many of their traditional tasks, as well as new ones.

And some dogs, once rendered unemployed by new technology, are being rehired.

"When snowmobiles were introduced, the Greenland dog was out of favour as a reindeer herder," she said.

"But it turns out that reindeer don't respond well to being herded by snowmobiles. It turns out the dogs are more useful than the machines - and more environmentally friendly."

A Greyhound's long legs and great lung capacity or the insatiable urge to dig shared by the terriers may be a case of form following function. But there are 420 different breeds in the World Atlas, and the authors acknowledge they didn't list every breed.

And yet it includes 30 French scent hounds, from the familiar bassett hound to the now-extinct levesque. Does any nation need 30 different types of scent hounds?

But then, of course, the French celebrate the regional differences in their cheese and wine, so why not the ones in their dogs?

Russell-Revesz laughed.

"Depending on the prey, the terrain and the climate, they may have needed different length legs or more or less coat. But the truth is that each region took great pride in its local hounds and wanted to have their own."

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (3)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

The irony of reading this article here, published in a province that has allowed a private association (NBVMA) through a minority lead; allowed 35+ individual vets to make public policy. A policy which effects the future of many breeds that reside here. Several, as mentioned in the article were almost extinct after WWII. History repeats itself here in NB, breeds some that can trace their lineage back for over 400 years but has had their future determined by the big brother Vet Community. One would ask since the vets have taken a stand; is it due to poor health rampant in a breed? No several of these breeds are statistically among the healthiest, carefully preserved by those that are passionate their safeguarding. I ask the simple question; dew claw and docking.....lets look at putting cat de-clawing on the table, what about comments on research denouncing yearly vaccinations? mark ups on drugs at many vet clinics and what each vet is doing about pet overpopulation? Do your homework.
12
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
Tina S., Fredericton on 06/07/09 10:32:15 AM AST

Hi Tina, just my opinion here, but i'd like to put my comments on the table.

First, dew claws and docking, quite frankly, I myself find these practices wrong, first the claws if they were born with them they are there for a reason. Docking to me is also appalling, as the tail is an extension of their backbones, to dock a dogs tail, then in 10 years time I will show you a lame dog full of arthritis.
You mentioned declawing cats, wrong as well, people want these animals for pets, then they let them outside to roam the rural landscape or the city streets where they end up getting into scrapes with other animals or folks who want to hurt them, then they end up either in the spca to be taken care of or the vets.
I as a pet owner stand beside the guifelines that they instill, often we have needed our Vetinarian and they have always been there for our "babies.
On behalf of Kirby, Samson, Rozie, and Annabelle, thank you Dr. Geoff Hampton and all those who have taken care of them.
2
Thumbs Up
4
Thumbs Down
frank Andrew drost, minto on 09/07/09 01:05:16 PM AST
Since it's true that humans have had their hand in creating and defining every breed we see today. So why is it that now we want to condemn certain breeds?

I have a friend who owns a wonderful rottie. She is not quite a year and in still in the energetic puppy stage. Now, the "community" have decided they do not want her in their neighborhood. She is being condemned because she is a rottie, not because she is any different from any other puppy but because the breed is feared.

So my question to society is why have we put so many years into creating the rottweiler breed to the standards that we have today if we have no use for them. With proper training rotties can be wonderfully loyal pets, great guard dogs with a calm demeanor. And yet these people do not want her in their neighborhood?

I believe firmly in not judging a book by it's cover. I am not prejudiced towards any person or animal. Every breed has a few bad apples and it is unjust to condemn any breed.
3
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Crystal Foran, Fredericton on 10/07/09 10:23:24 AM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles