Prepare to pay for ambulance service today

Published Wednesday July 1st, 2009

$130, please | Liberals eliminated free service

A1

An ambulance trip in New Brunswick is no longer free.

Starting today, a user fee of $130.60 will be charged when an ambulance responds to a 9-1-1 call inside the province.

As previously announced in March's provincial budget, the fee is being reinstated by the Liberal government four years after the Progressive Conservatives eliminated it.

The Liberals said ambulance usage across the province had jumped by 20 per cent each year, and that the service was being abused.

Former health minister Mike Murphy said in some cases ambulances were being used as a taxi service.

The provincial government says an ambulance user fee will raise $6 million for the province each year, with the fee recovering about 25 per cent of service costs.

Every other province in Canada has a user fee for ambulances responding to emergency calls, with New Brunswick's fees now being the same as Nova Scotia's.

The provincial government said emergency responses won't change.

"No one will be denied an ambulance in an emergency," said Meghan Cumby, spokeswoman for the Department of Health.

Instead, ambulance users will be sent a bill later.

"In the 10 business days following your transport or taking of the ambulance, a bill will arrive at your house and you'll have 30 days to pay it," said Ambulance NB spokeswoman Sophie Cormier-Lalonde.

An appeals process for people who can't afford the fee can be initiated by dialing a phone number on the bill.

The appeal, to be evaluated by the province, will be decided on a case-by-case basis, with the appellant detailing why he or she can't pay.

User fees won't apply to ambulances making transfers between hospitals, air ambulance services, social services clients, those in foster care, or any eligible clients of the extra-mural program.

"It's similar to the groups on the prescription drug program," said Cumby, detailing the protocol used for who was exempt.

Blue Cross covers the user fee for those with health insurance.

Non-New Brunswick residents will continue to be charged $650 when using an ambulance in an emergency situation.

When the budget came down in the legislature, the Progressive Conservatives immediately pounced on the Liberals for reinstating the fee.

Tory Leader David Alward said today is a sad day for the province's health-care system.

"It's the first point of contact with our health-care system," he said. "The last thing we need is our seniors or the most vulnerable afraid to make that call to 9-1-1 when they need an ambulance because they're thinking about whether or not they can afford it."

If the government thinks ambulances are being deployed for non-emergency situations, Alward said those people should be charged a few.

Ralph Smith, president of the New Brunswick Senior Citizens' Federation, said his group lobbied the previous government to see the ambulance user fee taken away.

"There's a lot of low-income seniors in New Brunswick," he said. "They will hesitate to call the ambulance when there's that kind of fee of $130. It will mean that in times when they should be calling the ambulance they're not, and it's really a health concern and a life and death situation, too."

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (7)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

I did notice that Mr. Alward wasn't so saddened as to state unequivocally he and his party would remove the fee once he came in power.
43
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
D STEWART, Fredericton on 01/07/09 10:52:16 AM AST
I am absolutely convinced that we the general public as voters have perfected stupidity, Where and how do we find these people that we elect to represent us in government. The decisions made by Alababa Graham and his band of merrymen in no way represents the feeling of the public that they are suppose to be there to serve, hpoefully we all don't forget when it comes to the next election. Charging the sick and vulnerable for ambulance is totally ridiculous. The new kid on the block (Mary Schryer) is full of it also, she is no better than Mr.Murphy or she would have rescinded the order to charge for ambulances so in other words we cannot expect to see too much from her other than to say YES to every idiotic whim that Alababa Graham has.
24
Thumbs Up
20
Thumbs Down
Old Boot, Fredericton on 01/07/09 11:15:04 AM AST
For Mike Murphy to say that the ambulance service is sometimes used as a taxi service is to say that those fine people that work on the ambulances and provide a wonderful service to the public,are incompetent and for him to suggest this he should be made to apologize to these people that work so hard on our behalf
17
Thumbs Up
25
Thumbs Down
Old Boot, Fredericton on 01/07/09 11:37:53 AM AST
Actually Old Boot regardless whether you agree or disagree with the user fee it is irresponsible to suggest that Mike Murphy is calling ambulance workers incompetent. It is obvious he is talking about some of those that use the service for a free ride to a hospital and not an emergency. The drivers and attendants do provide a fine service and as such when called will do their job...even if the person has wasted their time and perhaps put others in danger for the sake of a free trip to the hospital.
20
Thumbs Up
10
Thumbs Down
D STEWART, Fredericton on 01/07/09 12:16:10 PM AST
One of the best things to happen to the ambulance service, this will curb those idiots who call because they have a sore back or cut finger, if we didn't abuse the system like it has been then we wouldn't have to pay for it....I do think though the people who call for a legitimate reason shouldn't pay, the fools who want a free trip to the hospital should pay everytime....just like in the emergency rooms...we waited 7 hrs one night and a man was there because he hit his finger with a hammer..we bring these user fees on ourselves.
19
Thumbs Up
11
Thumbs Down
Maritimer Maritimer, Fredericton on 01/07/09 12:52:58 PM AST
I'm absolutely sure te service is used as a taxi service in many instances, just like the 911 service is abused...people will call 911 for a cat stuck in a tree. People will call for an ambulance for a broken arm. Stop and think. HOW MANY TIMES DO YOU USE AN AMBULANCE IN ONE YEAR? I've never used one, and don't know many who have. I think $130 is fair fee if it will cut down on some of the abuse, considering that a very, very small segement of the population will have to pay it in the first place.
19
Thumbs Up
3
Thumbs Down
Omemee With Love, Shh! on 01/07/09 03:48:19 PM AST
Sorry, but I disagree. It will not cut down on the abuse at all because most of the abusers won't be paying for this service anyways.

I was a Paramedic long before the fees were removed several years ago, and there was abuse then, and it will continue now. What they need to do is bill the abusers, and it is easy to track for "the company" by using their data base.

Every time there is a call, the patient's medicare # is recorded in the system, thus making it easy to track the abusers. Start sending them the bill, and leave the person who makes their legitimate call, perhaps once in a lifetime, alone.
12
Thumbs Up
9
Thumbs Down
I Give A Damn, Saint John on 01/07/09 04:39:22 PM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles