Ashfield defends Harper's record

Published Wednesday October 8th, 2008
A1

If any of the five federal candidates for the job of Fredericton MP needed a bulletproof vest at The Daily Gleaner-St. Thomas University debate Tuesday night it was Conservative Keith Ashfield.

Click to Enlarge
The Dally Gleaner/Ray Bourgeois
All-candidates meeting in fredericton: From left, Liberal candidate David Innes, NDP candidate Jesse Travis, Green party candidate Mary Lou Babineau, Conservative candidate Keith Ashfield and Canadian Action Party candidate Ben Kelly tackle the issues during a candidates forum Tuesday night. The Daily Gleaner and St. Thomas University presented the debate.

The candidate representing the incumbent political party had to defend the Harper government track record on a wide range of issues, from the economy to student debt.

While the first half of the debate was placid enough, the second half sparked more jabs as the packed auditorium at Margaret Norrie McCain Hall provided fuel to the fire.

On the economy, Ashfield said the current cycle of global financial distress has been brewing for more than two years, even though it erupted two weeks ago.

He said it will take Stephen Harper and the Conservative government's steady hand on the tiller, restrained and measured approach to spending to keep the Canadian economy stable.

Only in his closing remarks did Ashfield assail the Liberal party's carbon tax plan as a step that will hurt the pocketbooks of Canadians and launch the country into billions of dollars of reckless spending. Liberal candidate David Innes said Stephane Dion's policies will make polluters pay and stimulate the economy.

"The worst kept secret in Canada is that the Conservatives have no plan. They have no plan to deal with the problems and crises that we face, including the looming economic turmoil that's spreading from the United States," Innes said.

NDP candidate Jesse Travis said while the economy is the resounding issue facing the nation, he said there's a troubling trend toward favouring Canadian businesses over Canadian families.

"Our population is shrinking. We've experienced cutbacks in health care and social services and while the Liberals and Conservatives have enjoyed the ride, the rest of us are paying the price," Travis said.

Green party candidate Mary Lou Babineau said the long-term prosperity of the country can only be secured with sustainable practices and a new way of conducting politics.

"It involves a substantial tax shift where our pollution will be taxed and that revenue used to reinvest heavily in communities," she said.

Canadian Action Party candidate Ben Kelly said his party believes a total rejig of the country's economic thinking and more reliance on the Bank of Canada as the nation's lender of choice would change the economic fate of the nation.

On some issues, there was consensus. All of the candidates were willing to revisit the issue of Agent Orange compensation for former Canadian Forces Base Gagetown workers and their widows.

On the military, Ashfield said the Conservatives have pledged more military spending for the Canadian mission in Afghanistan until 2010.

The other candidates want to see Canadian troops return to a peace-keeping role, rather than a combat position.

On others, they diverged. While Ashfield stuck to the Conservative tough line on crime, Babineau said the Green Party supports restorative justice for first-time, non-violent offenders.

Travis said reducing poverty, beefing up educational opportunities

and adding more police officers will help.

If locking up everybody worked, the U.S. would have solved the problem of crime, Innes said.

"Ease up on locking up the 14-year-olds," Innes said.

A member of the Raging Grannies group asked candidates what will happen if the Harper government is returned with a majority. Innes said a Harper majority is a majority of one.

"He does what he wants to do," Innes said. "It's the style of one man and his name is Harper."

"It scares the pants off me," Travis said.

STU political science student Michael Manning wanted to hear more about student loans, the environment and government accountability from the candidates.

"A lot of the answers to the questions are typical politics. Let's work more together and come to a solution. We don't see that a lot," Manning said.

For student Courtney Mills, who's attending school and raising a baby, student debt and child care were important issues barely touched upon Tuesday night.

"Child care is something that hasn't been addressed ... I want to hear if anyone has concrete strategies ," Mills said.

Finding a licensed daycare space requires up to a three-year wait in the capital city, Mills said.

The NDP and Green party candidates said their style of politics would be a departure from the traditional.

Babineau said the Greens are committed to a co-operative approach to working with other political parties.

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (6)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

Having attended the debate last night, I thought all the candidates spoke reasonably well. My biggest concern as a slightly left-leaning voter is that the NDP and Greens are going to take just enough votes off of the Liberal candidate to elect the Conservative. Until we make the switch to a system of proportional representation, a vote for the NDP or the Greens is unfortunately a vote for the Conservatives, in Fredericton at least.
52
Thumbs Up
46
Thumbs Down
Joel Reed, Fredericton on 08/10/08 10:03:49 AM AST
Two quick points:

First, I think the above-mentioned "strategic voting" approach only makes sense if you want a U.S.-style two-party political system. And if we vote only liberal or conservative, the voting system will never move toward proportional representation!

Second, the Green candidate Babineau is the only candidate who fully supports a woman's right to choose. The other candidates' support for women's reproductive rights is lukewarm at best. Babineau supports choice both personally and politically.

38
Thumbs Up
40
Thumbs Down
anonymous anonymous, fredericton on 08/10/08 12:33:00 PM AST
I am all about the ABC campaign and pondered for weeks how to get the most out of my vote.

After attending the debate last night I have finally decided who I am going to support. I grew up in a family of strong Liberal supporters but this time I did not feel confident in voting for the Liberal Party.

I decided that since I live in a country that supports and encourages people to vote for what they believe in - that I will do just that. I am not going to vote for a party that I don't believe in just because I feel they have the best chance of taking the power away from the Conservatives. That would totally defeat the purpose would it not?
27
Thumbs Up
30
Thumbs Down
Go Green, Fredericton on 08/10/08 03:49:53 PM AST
If voting for whom you believe in is what it takes to make you happy then of course that is just where your vote should go. But there is nothing remotely "U.S. Style" about deciding to cast a vote strategically. It is every bit as valid a decision as the reasons both double anon and Go Green give. You weigh your options and your choices and you decide for your own reasons where you will cast your vote...just as they did. If as some believe there is no difference between the two traditional parties that win in this riding (and there is no doubt that only two have that chance here) then your decision is actually somewhat easier. If however one of those parties that will actually form the government has policies that you just cannot abide by while the other although perhaps not your favorite at least does not make you cringe at their mere mention then why would it be any less "Canadian" to decide to vote "strategically" and try and keep what you surely can't live with out of power?
19
Thumbs Up
8
Thumbs Down
D STEWART, Fredericton on 08/10/08 05:34:47 PM AST
Well Joel Reed may be write in some sense when he states

Until we make the switch to a system of proportional representation,
a vote for the NDP or the Greens is
unfortunately a vote for the Conservatives

However, if we restrict ourselves to voting Conservative or
Liberal, we will never make the switch to a system of proportional
representation.



9
Thumbs Up
15
Thumbs Down
William Hughes, Fredericton on 08/10/08 08:52:56 PM AST
You want your vote to really count. Think about vote swapping! You can trade votes with other Canadian's.
9
Thumbs Up
6
Thumbs Down
Crazy Cat, Freddy Beach on 09/10/08 09:42:00 AM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles