Power deal lights up faces at city hall

Published Tuesday November 24th, 2009

Savings to be had | Assistant treasurer says municipality would save $50,000 per year during five-year rate freeze

A1

The City of Fredericton will save nearly $50,000 a year if the deal to sell NB Power to Hydro-Quebec goes through, says an official at city hall.

Tina Tapley-Jones, assistant city treasurer, said Monday that the capital's electricity bill in 2009 was budgeted at $2.59 million.

When street lights are factored in, the city bought $1.59 million worth of electricity, she said.

"For 2009 ... we budget three per cent for a rate increase or inflation costs," said Tapley-Jones.

"We would have saved $46,421 if there had been a rate freeze."

The Liberal government is planning to sell NB Power to Hydro-Quebec for $4.75 billion, which would pay off NB Power's debt.

The deal also includes $5 billion in rate relief.

Residential and commercial power users would receive a five-year rate freeze and industry would get an immediate 30 per cent rate cut.

"The majority of our city facilities are billed at the commercial rate," said Tapley-Jones.

That means the city would qualify for the five-year rate freeze under the deal to sell NB Power, she said.

Street light power costs aren't included in the equation because they're based on an unmetered, per pole cost and city hall doesn't know how that will be affected by the deal because it's not mentioned in the memorandum of understanding.

"I based the rate freeze on our commercial rate power budget," said Tapley-Jones.

The total savings over the five-year rate freeze for the city would be greater than $250,000 because the government is projecting NB Power would need a rate increase of three per cent a year and those increases would compound year after year.

The deal to sell most of NB Power's assets to Hydro-Quebec is expected to be signed by the end of March 2010.

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (32)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

Doesn't Tina know that the province can stop any rate increases? Well, I think all NB Power emoployees should boycott buying anything in Fredericton and spend their money in Quebec. I wonder how much money the city woud save then?
81
Thumbs Up
28
Thumbs Down
Richard LeBlanc, Dalhousie on 24/11/09 07:58:14 AM AST
All they are seeing is the short term gain and five years is really short term. What about after that???? They will be at the mercy of QH just like the rest of us. The blind leading the blind.
93
Thumbs Up
21
Thumbs Down
Joseph C, Rusagonis on 24/11/09 08:20:24 AM AST
"...Street light power costs aren't included in the equation because they're based on an unmetered, per pole cost and city hall doesn't know how that will be affected by the deal because it's not mentioned in the memorandum of understanding...."

I'm curious about this, as well, as I have one on my property (that I pay a monthly fee on) and would like to know if the price of this will go UP or DOWN. Yet another thing on a bill that isn't "rate" related that isn't explained in the MOU.
72
Thumbs Up
7
Thumbs Down
JustRight OfCenter, Fredericton area on 24/11/09 08:30:37 AM AST
Lets face it, $50,000.00 is not a lot for a city. Like you said short term, geesh what is up with these people having their blinders on and not looking at the big picture or long term here?
80
Thumbs Up
21
Thumbs Down
Tracy NB, Fredericton on 24/11/09 08:32:16 AM AST
We have to remember where this comment is coming from, our mayor is liberal to the bone and you would have a family reunion of liberals if one were to have a meeting. 50 thousand dollars a year is a laugh, all they would do is create a new position for one of their own. This is a bad deal. Mr. Shawn should put it to a referendum but you won’t see that.
67
Thumbs Up
11
Thumbs Down
Track Dad, Fredericton on 24/11/09 09:05:21 AM AST
Hey Maritime Boy, the problem isn't with the buyer but the seller. $50,000 a year comes to about $1 a year for each man, woman and child - what a saving
63
Thumbs Up
8
Thumbs Down
Sly One, New Maryland on 24/11/09 09:12:08 AM AST
This is so typical of this so called newspaper. When HQ starts cutting jobs in their subsidary office in Frdericton and pull 20+ million dollars payroll out of the city, Frederictonian will see the real impact. Of course this newspaper is looking for story like this everyday to try to promote this deal, but no reporting on any potential negative impact, this is hardly balanced reporting.
78
Thumbs Up
8
Thumbs Down
Whispur NB, Fredericton on 24/11/09 09:14:17 AM AST
Richard LeBlanc> The province can't just "stop rate increases". NB Power is drowning in debt, and with energy costs on the rise, the only way to keep the thing running will be to continue jacking up rates. NB already has some of the highest rates in the country, and with the huge current debt load, we will soon be the highest.

People against this deal need to get their heads around the fact that the entire province of NB has about the same number of people as the city of Hamilton ON, except they are spread out over an area 60 TIMES the size. It is very expensive to power this province. On top of this half of the province is using aging dirty coal power plants that desperately need to be replaced.

Just be sure, if this deal does not go through, your power rates WILL continue to go up year after year after year.
22
Thumbs Up
79
Thumbs Down
Bob Barnes, Fredericton on 24/11/09 09:15:21 AM AST
Why would any one give thumbs down to Bob for stating the facts. The government is doing a poor job explaining this deal to the public and the facts are getting lost to the fear mongers.
20
Thumbs Up
65
Thumbs Down
read it again, F-ton on 24/11/09 09:39:17 AM AST
I notice the Gleaner has no story today about the poll showing 60% opposition and only 22% support for the deal, as well as the Liberals now being 10 points behind the Tories in the polls. Funny, that.

Also, your "facts" are wrong Bob. Provincial debt and NB Power debt are seperate, and NB Power's debt is not going up. The Auditor General already disproved everything Shawn Graham has said about debt in this deal.

In fact this makes provincial debt worse, the province loses $100 million a year in taxes that NB Power pays, since according to the MOU Hydro Quebec's NB Subsidiary is tax exempt.

This deal doesn't make debt magically go away. It takes the debt, and the revenue that is paying the debt. What we get instead is a wing and a prayer that we won't simply get gouged by Quebec in 5 years or on any new power (since any new power isn't covered by the rate freeze anyway).
54
Thumbs Up
5
Thumbs Down
Chris Eaton, Fredericton on 24/11/09 09:53:24 AM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles