This is no time for luxuries

Published Tuesday June 30th, 2009
C6

You have to hand it to newly minted Education Minister Roland Hache.

He didn't waste any time making his mark on his new department.

The first thing he did after being named the minister last week was freeze all spending, including the sacred cow of the Department of Education - the Innovative Learning Fund.

That is an important and impressive first move.

The fund was the brainchild of former education minister Kelly Lamrock, who set it up to reward the creativity of teachers by funding their unique ideas on teaching and learning.

By last fall, $4.1 million had been spent on 421 of these great ideas, and more than $618,000 of it was spent in District 18. His fund has financed hands-on learning projects on diverse topics from robotics and technology to fractions, literacy, geography and cooking.

Lamrock, perhaps in an effort to offset the bad news of laid-off library assistants and teacher assistants, cut the budget of his Innovative Learning Fund this spring, but that didn't make up for the blatant hostility. If letters to the editor are an indication, there are plenty of ticked off school support workers affected by the cuts to education and parents whose children will be affected.

Now the New Brunswick Teachers' Federation and the school support workers are anxiously waiting to hear if the $3.35 million in the Innovative Learning Fund will be spent to re-instate the $2.9 million education cut that saw 588 full- and part-time support workers laid off.

There's enough money to do that, with a bit left over, and we believe rehiring those laid-off workers would be the best move politically and financially - the government needs some positive news, people need their jobs and students need support at school.

The teachers' union has always disliked the fund. They don't want their member teachers rewarded by any other means than through their negotiated contract, and they say the money for the fund came straight out of the classroom in the first place.

But Lamrock had a good idea in creating the fund. It is wise to reward creativity and keep those innovative projects supported, all in an effort to make learning easier for children.

The problem with the fund in this recession economy is that it is a frill - a luxury that we can no longer afford.

When you're dealing with a growing deficit and the economy is in the pits, and you're forced to lay off 588 support staff, holding on to luxuries indicates someone's priorities are not in order.

Thankfully, it appears Hache is seeing the issue more clearly than his predecessor did.

When the economy rebounds, the deficit has disappeared and we are back in the black, the concept of the Innovative Learning Fund can be revisited, and it may well prove to be worthy of rebirth.

But in the meantime, there are far more important ways to spend taxpayer money, beginning with the rehiring of support staff.

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (7)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

I proposed this over a month ago. Unfortunately, Lamrock wouldn't listen.

Hopefully, it seems like Mr. Hache is on the right track and we will see all of these positions reinstated before the end of the week.
42
Thumbs Up
5
Thumbs Down
J J, Moncton on 30/06/09 08:41:51 AM AST
I will not praise Mr. Hache's move until he indicates that he will reinstate the cut positions. Until he does that, freezing the ILF means little.
43
Thumbs Up
5
Thumbs Down
Concerned Educator, NB on 30/06/09 09:05:43 AM AST
Teachers who were given ILF grants were told not to spend them (before they finished for the summer). Most are online and using e-mail, and most do work quite a bit over the summer, at home and at school.
41
Thumbs Up
3
Thumbs Down
Concerned Educator, NB on 30/06/09 09:22:20 AM AST
This is just another ploy of the Graham government to try to apease the irate voters. I certainly hope people remeber the incompetence and back peddaling at election time.
22
Thumbs Up
6
Thumbs Down
Jo Anne C., Fredericton on 30/06/09 09:25:43 AM AST
RA EL, I work in schools, frequently visit them in the summer, and often meet teachers doing work. Most people who have so many negative things to say about teachers really have no idea just what they do. It is easier to sit back and criticize what you don't know. I have worked with many teachers over the years (I am not a teacher) as a parent, volunteer and education worker. Most are very dedicated and work long hours during the school year and many hours at home or school during the summer. I am sick of people constantly attacking teachers and others who educate our children, when these critics have no idea what they are talking about. There is so much jealousy and hate toward teachers; most of it, I think, due to the (mistaken)idea that teachers are paid for summer, Christmas and March breaks. There is no other profession I know of where so many people put in so much unpaid overtime.
40
Thumbs Up
14
Thumbs Down
Concerned Educator, NB on 30/06/09 11:37:13 AM AST
Concerned Educator,
You are correct. I know a number of teachers in two different districts that spend countless extra hours during the school year and over the summer at the school and/or at home working to prepare for the next day. I am sure not all do this but I would bet that the majority do. In addition they (at least elementary-level) pay out of their own pockets to outfit many of the activities of the classroom.
Their pro-rated vacation leave over the summer is deserved.
39
Thumbs Up
12
Thumbs Down
G. Murray, Woodstock on 30/06/09 12:23:27 PM AST
Especially in these times when teachers are shuffled between grade/content area. They spend their summer months going through the Curriculum requirements of their new role, and in the case of this year's grade 2 EFI's teachers, learning differences in the curriculum outcomes in the English classroom.

This the time that teachers look back on their year, and make choices about how they will set up their classrooms, what supplies they need, order them in, make choices about text books etc. Trust me - my mother was a teacher. I have family members who are teachers here and other provinces.

I would also like to throw it out there-it seems alot of venom is spewed about the teachers not being in the classroom for July and August. We all had a choice of career-any of us could have chosen to become a teacher. Those who teach our children deserve our support and praise, not uninformed opinion and abuse.
9
Thumbs Up
7
Thumbs Down
K. Chapman, Moncton on 02/07/09 10:23:47 AM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles