
We should let people decide about NB Power
Published Tuesday November 3rd, 2009


On the question of NB Power and its future, Shawn Graham was clear.
"Our position is: "Look, this is an asset of the province and we want to keep it in the ownership of New Brunswickers."
So, too, was the Charter for Change, the Liberal party's 2006 election platform.
A Liberal government, it declared will "Maintain NB Power as a publicly-owned utility that will serve all New Brunswickers."
But that was then and this is now.
The government's intention to sell NB Power to Hydro-Quebec may or may not be good public policy.
But it is bad form.
Trusting Shawn Graham and believing the Charter for Change, the people of New Brunswick voted in good faith.
That trust has been broken and that faith betrayed.
The people of New Brunswick can rightly say: "We were sold a bill of goods."
And they can rightly demand an election on the issue.
Indeed, New Brunwickers deserve no less than the people of Quebec in 1962.
Premier Jean Lesage had been elected in 1960 on the slogan of "C'est le temps que ça change," or "It's time for a change."
Surrounded by a talented group of cabinet ministers, Premier Lesage began real transformational change in Quebec.
Almost over night, the Quiet Revolution transformed Quebec into a modern, secular, bureaucratic state.
It was in this context that Premier Lesage's most talented -and most popular - cabinet minister proposed the nationalization of Quebec's hydroelectric power.
As minister of natural resources, René Lévesque took his proposal to a special Cabinet meeting at a government-owned retreat north of Quebec City.
For two days, Levesque carried the debate. His idea was as simple as it was bold: the government would create a publicly-owned electrical utility out of the many small privately-owned utilities. In turn, the new utility would undertake the massive expansion of Quebec's capacity to generate hydroelectricity as part of the province's larger economic and industrial strategy.
Lévesque reminded his colleagues that Ontario had nationalized electricity in 1906.
For heaven's sake, even New Brunswick had created its own publicly-owned utility, he said.
In the end, Lévesque made true believers out of so many doubting Thomases: Premier Lesage and the Cabinet committed themselves to the nationalization of hydroelectricity.
But both Lesage and his cabinet also knew they had not campaigned on the issue in 1960.
A committed democrat, Premier Lesage called a snap election.
Better than "It's time for a change," he campaigned on the slogan of "Maîtres Chez Nous," or "Masters in Our Own House."
A tireless René Lévesque criss-crossed the province.
In church basements, community centres, school auditoriums, and local arenas he presented his plan with both reason and emotion.
"We, and nobody else, will make our own decisions, right here," he told Quebecers.
On Nov. 14, 1962, Jean Lesage, René Lévesque, and the Liberal party were returned to power with an even larger majority and Hydro-Quebec was born.
Premier Graham should follow the courageous example of Premier Lesage: call an election and let the people decide.
And his minister of energy should be compelled to criss-cross the province to explain to New Brunswickers why somebody else should make our decisions for us and why we shouldn't be masters in our own house.
After all, and in the words of the Charter of Change, "The people of New Brunswick are the shareholders of NB Power."
Donald Wright teaches in the Department of Political Science at UNB.


Disabled








Search Articles


Comments (11)
All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.
Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.
The Liberal platform said was that they wanted lower power rates for the people, and that because of the effects of privatization else where, they felt keeping NB Power was the only way to prevent rate shock.
They found a better way to lower rate and are honouring the spirit of their promise.
Now that is rich.
If the deal is good, go to the polls. People are smart and will listen. The Liberal platform of '06 was clear, and they have clearly broken their promise.
But Alward needs to come out and explain why this deal is bad, namely; the stable rates are limited to a set amount of power, we pay to decommission plants and HQ keeps the carbon credits, we finish Lepreau and give it away. And many more deficiencies in the deal.
But with the crack team of negotiators, it is no surprise they could mess up what should have been a good deal.
NB Power being sold is fine, giving it away is stupid.
I would urge everyone, if this matter does go to a vote, read all the details of the deal, think about it calmly, logically and rationally, and vote responsibly. Voting out of anger or ignorance does not solve anything. Anger often leads us to do things that we later regret.
If you were on trial, you'd want the jury to hear all the facts before making a decision. You wouldn't want them to hear only one side of the story and immediately decide you were guilty based on that, or worse, based on your appearance.
Graham had referenda on amalgamating several rural areas two years ago, there is a reason the province has laws governing referenda. This is probably the best example yet of when a referendum is needed (except maybe for the proportional representation referendum which Graham cancelled).
Sarcasm aside, this editorial is spot on. The Liberals have no mandate to do this. Voters need to be the ones to decide this. Call an immediate election.
What he really meant to say was....screw you people of NB, I will do what I want and you will not stop me....until Sept 2010 that is!!