Teacher assistant faces allegation of touching teen

Published Wednesday November 19th, 2008
A1

School District 18 officials testified Tuesday that a former Leo Hayes High School teacher assistant facing a sex-crime allegation involving a student was in a position of responsibility over students.

Jonathan Samuel Staples, 35, of Zealand was in provincial court Tuesday to stand trial on a charge that he touched a young person sexually between April 1-30, 2007, while he was in a position of trust or authority over that young person.

Leo Hayes principal Kevin Pottle testified the student in question and the boy's mother came to him May 24, 2007, to report some concerns about Staples, who was working as a teacher assistant at the high school at the time.

Based on that conversation, he said, he contacted the city police and Karen Morton, the district's director of human resources.

After a meeting later that afternoon between Staples, himself and Morton, Pottle said, Staples was "reassigned to home."

Morton said she "advised him his services were no longer required."

Pottle said while teachers and teacher assistants (TAs) have different responsibilities, TAs and other school employees as well as volunteers do have responsibilities to students, as outlined in District 18's Policy 701.

That policy governs student protection and safety, and it outlines what constitutes abuse and misconduct toward students.

That includes: "behaviour of a sexual nature with pupils such as: making or accepting sexual advances or invitations, asking for a date, touching inappropriately or having sexual relationship; (or) behaviour which is considered physical, sexual, or emotional abuse or neglect of a child whether or not the child is a pupil in the public school system," the policy states.

Morton said all those applying for jobs with the school district have to fill out a questionnaire on the principles and rules listed in Policy 701.

She produced the questionnaire that Staples had filled out, which was entered as an exhibit with the court.

Leo Hayes vice-principal Nathalie Capson-Daniels said that as adults in the school system, teacher assistants definitely have responsibilities to the students.

"Obviously, they're in a position of authority over students," she testified Tuesday.

All the school officials testified it doesn't appear as though Staples served as a TA with any class of which the complainant was a member.

Ken Sprague, 29, Staples's boyfriend of more than five years, testified that the student called Staples on a Sunday night in April 2007 looking for a place to stay, either because he'd been kicked out of his home or he stormed out.

Sprague said it would be OK for the teenager to stay at his place, as his parents were away for the night. Staples drove to pick the boy up, he said.

After the student had arrived at Sprague's residence, he said, the boy made a pass at him when they were alone at one point.

"He started coming on to me," Sprague said, noting he rejected those advances.

"Eventually, he leaned in and tried to kiss me."

Later that evening, he, Staples and the student were all just hanging out and talking on Sprague's bed.

Sprague said when it was time for bed, the student didn't want to leave the room to go to sleep in a separate room that had been set up for him.

"He was really resistant. He kept trying to talk us into letting him stay," he said.

In the following weeks, Sprague said, he communicated with the boy online.

He said the teen wanted to meet him alone to talk about something in person, and when Staples learned of that, the accused admitted to his boyfriend he and the boy had kissed.

"He said it had only happened once ... I was angry, only for a second," Sprague said.

Later, the boy told Sprague the intimate contact between him and Staples had gone much further than just kissing.

Leo Hayes teacher Brenda Cameron testified she saw Staples and the boy arrive together on school grounds one day.

She said the boy didn't seem upset or in distress as he got out of Staples's car.

RCMP forensic computer analyst Payman Hakimian testified that he recovered 22 relevant MSN Messenger chat logs from the student's computer.

Those chats were between the student and Staples, him and Sprague, and between him and another individual.

Hakimian said he also examined Staples's cellphone and thumb drive.

He found that the student was listed on the cellphone directory and there was a record of calls between Staples's phone and the teenager's phone.

Hakimian said his examination of the boy's computer also led to the discovery of some images that constituted child pornography.

When defence lawyer Edward Derrah asked him if the boy had been charged as a result of that discovery, Hakimian said he didn't know, noting such decisions are left to police officers and prosecutors.

The trial continues Nov. 25, at which time the teenage complainant is scheduled to testify.

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (49)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

Procecute him to the fullest and if you get a conviction send him off to a womens prison, Sending him to a male prison would be rewarding him
26
Thumbs Up
49
Thumbs Down
Bruins Fan Still Hoping, Fredericton on 19/11/08 09:55:43 AM AST
Prison isn't rewarding for anyone, you might want to open your eyes to the world if you really think so.

Bruins fan - your paranoid homophobic bashing is nothing more than a cry for attention, you might want to seek some professional help, or grow up.

Clearly something 'consenting' occurred, however being in a position of trust Staples, the teacher, will be the one to blame over it. This fact is regardless of sexual preference.

Hopefully with the ramp up in the courts this student won't get off without charge either, since Child Pornography was discovered on their computer, a far worse crime in the eyes of the law.
27
Thumbs Up
34
Thumbs Down
Anon Nimity, Fredericton on 19/11/08 12:50:42 PM AST
Hey bruin I went over and read his comments and like I commented in the times he is an idiot and like I did over there We all apologize for someone saying something like that. I blasted him and everyone that gave it a thumbs up. We are not all like that. Yuor allowed your opions no matter if they are right or wrong it doesn't matter. No one has the right to wish something like that on a child. Cool down and come back tommorrow. I enjoy sparing with you.
21
Thumbs Up
7
Thumbs Down
Does it matter not much , Fredericton on 19/11/08 01:30:20 PM AST
I would be shocked to see if this guy got any form of punishment from these charges.People get away with worse. I am the mother of a child who was molested by Gordon Clowater and I have to say he only got a couple of months in jail for admittedly "touching for sexual purpose" a disabled child. Although the cases are different they arn't at the same time. These men are in a position of trust to children. The TA should have used better judgement in contacting this child. There was an adult in this situatiuon and he did not act like one by even talking to this child outside of school, msn'ing him....etc. He was rightfully brought up on charges and I pray the law will make an example out of him. He was in a position of trust and from what I read he took advantage of it. He is a pervert and he will get his punishment one way or another.
13
Thumbs Up
13
Thumbs Down
Vicki P., Fredericton on 19/11/08 04:20:27 PM AST
I agree with you Vicki... It is party our fault that these freakin sickos think they can get away with this. Well the cold hard sad truth is that they can. If you shoot a deer outside of deer season you would get jail time, if you molest a child you can get away with house arrest. I dont care if the kid wanted to do it... doesnt matter your the aduld Staples do the right thing. I could say so many other things but I am sure someone would flag it as inappropriate. However maybe we should all get togeather and stand up for these kids and picket at the court house and set an example of staples. Anyways just my 2 cents.
17
Thumbs Up
18
Thumbs Down
Lesley O'Leary, Fredericton on 19/11/08 09:06:00 PM AST
It's amazing to me how the story is totally different when it's a male teacher facing allegations of 'touching' a student, and when it's a female teacher facing the exact same allegations, it gets swept under the rug. There should be no difference, whether it's a male or female teacher, the case should be treated the same, and prosecuted the same.
Last summer a female teacher was facing the same situation with a male student, and all they did was suspend her, she is now back working at a school in district 18. How's that for mind boggling??? I think it's disguisting, and I think she should save herself the embarrassment, if nothing else, and not show her face in any school ever again.
21
Thumbs Up
5
Thumbs Down
S. M, Fredericton on 20/11/08 01:19:19 AM AST
I agree... it shouldnt matter if you are male or female. It should all be treated the same. Touching is touching. I am so sick and tired of hearing about all these perverts in the world. Dont you think that it is time something is done about this???? Shouldnt our kids come first. It really blows my mind away that for ruining a childs life nothing happens. It is just so unfair. I am telling you if this was my child I dont know what I would do. Enough is ENOUGH. Lets get this stopped and protect our children!!!!!!!!!!!!
19
Thumbs Up
13
Thumbs Down
Lesley O'Leary, Fredericton on 20/11/08 07:50:48 AM AST
Be sure to actually read the article before passing judgment on Mr. Staples. Yes, what he did was undoubtedly wrong, but undeserving of jail time. As someone close to the alleged "victim" at the time the event occurred, I can honestly say that this boy was not a child, and what happened between he and Mr. Staples was not only consensual, but planned weeks in advance (by the teen, Mr. Staples was unaware). Only the adult in the situation showed any kind of reservation. The two met and conducted their friendship outside of school entirely. The boy felt hurt at being rejected and saw an opportunity to ruin this mans life and career. Additionally, the discovery of CHILD PORN on the teens computer (and NOT the TA's!) is a clear indicator of who the real predator is.
33
Thumbs Up
10
Thumbs Down
N. T., Fredericton on 20/11/08 09:22:51 AM AST
n.t. you may very well be right. however the TA was in a position of trust and knew what he was doing. his contact with the boy was improper at best and well according to police illegal at worst. one writer said that if it were a female student that we would be looking at this differently, i agree. however another writer correctly points out that the differences in the sexes are a fact of life. the predators like lt doug northrup that abused dozens of boys in the 70's need to be stopped. male, female, same sex or hetero.
8
Thumbs Up
12
Thumbs Down
lewis c, outerlimits on 20/11/08 06:33:20 PM AST
I agree Lewis C.. Staples was in a position of trust and weather the boy wanted it or not doesnt matter... WHO is the adult?????? That is the bottom line and anyone who thinks it is ok as to what Staples did is just as bad as he is!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! There is never a reason where it is ok to Kiss Touch or have Sex with a child I dont care if he is 16 or 18 it doesnt matter. A 35 year old man has NO business with a 16 year old...
9
Thumbs Up
16
Thumbs Down
Lesley O'Leary, Fredericton on 21/11/08 06:27:51 PM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles