Teacher assistant faces allegation of touching teen

Published Wednesday November 19th, 2008
A1

School District 18 officials testified Tuesday that a former Leo Hayes High School teacher assistant facing a sex-crime allegation involving a student was in a position of responsibility over students.

Jonathan Samuel Staples, 35, of Zealand was in provincial court Tuesday to stand trial on a charge that he touched a young person sexually between April 1-30, 2007, while he was in a position of trust or authority over that young person.

Leo Hayes principal Kevin Pottle testified the student in question and the boy's mother came to him May 24, 2007, to report some concerns about Staples, who was working as a teacher assistant at the high school at the time.

Based on that conversation, he said, he contacted the city police and Karen Morton, the district's director of human resources.

After a meeting later that afternoon between Staples, himself and Morton, Pottle said, Staples was "reassigned to home."

Morton said she "advised him his services were no longer required."

Pottle said while teachers and teacher assistants (TAs) have different responsibilities, TAs and other school employees as well as volunteers do have responsibilities to students, as outlined in District 18's Policy 701.

That policy governs student protection and safety, and it outlines what constitutes abuse and misconduct toward students.

That includes: "behaviour of a sexual nature with pupils such as: making or accepting sexual advances or invitations, asking for a date, touching inappropriately or having sexual relationship; (or) behaviour which is considered physical, sexual, or emotional abuse or neglect of a child whether or not the child is a pupil in the public school system," the policy states.

Morton said all those applying for jobs with the school district have to fill out a questionnaire on the principles and rules listed in Policy 701.

She produced the questionnaire that Staples had filled out, which was entered as an exhibit with the court.

Leo Hayes vice-principal Nathalie Capson-Daniels said that as adults in the school system, teacher assistants definitely have responsibilities to the students.

"Obviously, they're in a position of authority over students," she testified Tuesday.

All the school officials testified it doesn't appear as though Staples served as a TA with any class of which the complainant was a member.

Ken Sprague, 29, Staples's boyfriend of more than five years, testified that the student called Staples on a Sunday night in April 2007 looking for a place to stay, either because he'd been kicked out of his home or he stormed out.

Sprague said it would be OK for the teenager to stay at his place, as his parents were away for the night. Staples drove to pick the boy up, he said.

After the student had arrived at Sprague's residence, he said, the boy made a pass at him when they were alone at one point.

"He started coming on to me," Sprague said, noting he rejected those advances.

"Eventually, he leaned in and tried to kiss me."

Later that evening, he, Staples and the student were all just hanging out and talking on Sprague's bed.

Sprague said when it was time for bed, the student didn't want to leave the room to go to sleep in a separate room that had been set up for him.

"He was really resistant. He kept trying to talk us into letting him stay," he said.

In the following weeks, Sprague said, he communicated with the boy online.

He said the teen wanted to meet him alone to talk about something in person, and when Staples learned of that, the accused admitted to his boyfriend he and the boy had kissed.

"He said it had only happened once ... I was angry, only for a second," Sprague said.

Later, the boy told Sprague the intimate contact between him and Staples had gone much further than just kissing.

Leo Hayes teacher Brenda Cameron testified she saw Staples and the boy arrive together on school grounds one day.

She said the boy didn't seem upset or in distress as he got out of Staples's car.

RCMP forensic computer analyst Payman Hakimian testified that he recovered 22 relevant MSN Messenger chat logs from the student's computer.

Those chats were between the student and Staples, him and Sprague, and between him and another individual.

Hakimian said he also examined Staples's cellphone and thumb drive.

He found that the student was listed on the cellphone directory and there was a record of calls between Staples's phone and the teenager's phone.

Hakimian said his examination of the boy's computer also led to the discovery of some images that constituted child pornography.

When defence lawyer Edward Derrah asked him if the boy had been charged as a result of that discovery, Hakimian said he didn't know, noting such decisions are left to police officers and prosecutors.

The trial continues Nov. 25, at which time the teenage complainant is scheduled to testify.

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (49)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

N.T., Fredericton... it doesn't matter who the aggressor was. Mr. Staples is an authority figure. As an educator, he has taken an oathe to educate, protect, and be a role model to students - not get involved intimately with them. He could have still kept a friendship to some level with this student, he didn't have to get involved to the point where he picked him up, took him to his house etc. Those are all things one avoids as an authority figure, they should NEVER put themselves into a situation where it could later be misconstrued or used against them, and it's pretty much someone's word against their own.... and the burden is left on the accused to prove his/her innocense.
10
Thumbs Up
3
Thumbs Down
S. M, Fredericton on 22/11/08 04:52:27 PM AST
John Staples is a very good man. Yes he may have done this, and if the kid is who I heard he is, he has some issues to be delt with. I know John personally and he is a very caring man. He was just trying to help this kid out by giving him a place to stay when he thought the kid had nothing. John will do what he can to make sure that people are taken care of, and will not let someone go without. The bashing of him on here is ridiculous, and people need to stop judging him based on one incident.

N.T. I'd like to thank you for what you have said, it is all very true and it does seem like this kid did this to ruin John's life. He was a very good TA, I attended the school he worked at and never seen any problem with his way of handling students. And like I said, if this kid is who I have heard it is, he is not a child, he is only a year or two younger than I am, he knew what he was doing, and shouldn't of planned any of that.

John is a great man and I can only hope for the best
21
Thumbs Up
6
Thumbs Down
Anonymous ..., Fredericton on 22/11/08 06:37:26 PM AST
ya sapose the cops will lose the evidince and give him house arrest? sounds familiar.
0
Thumbs Up
14
Thumbs Down
alan paradis, laconia on 22/11/08 08:35:30 PM AST
If recent history tells us anything, the fredericton cops will loose any evidince and he will do house arrest.
0
Thumbs Up
13
Thumbs Down
alan paradis, laconia on 22/11/08 08:41:14 PM AST
the fredericton cops would probably loose any evidince and he would get house arrest. sound familiar? its not like he caught a salmon or shot a moose, something horrible like that!
0
Thumbs Up
13
Thumbs Down
alan paradis, laconia on 22/11/08 08:46:52 PM AST
If Mr. Staples wanted to help this 'kid'....then he could have made arrangements for the kid without bringing him into his home, or getting personally involved. There are ways of helping people without putting yourself in a potentially vulnerable situation. As a teachers assistant, Mr. Staples should have known that. Schools have guidance councellors available also. I'm sure Mr. Staples is a very nice and kind man...otherwise, he wouldn't have tried to help this kid, but, sometimes good intentions get messed up, while Mr. Staples was trying to 'help' the kid he should have realized that in helping someone, as their teacher, he needed to keep it on a teacher/student level... what's done is done, and I'm sure Mr. Staples wishes things were different.
6
Thumbs Up
6
Thumbs Down
S. M, Fredericton on 24/11/08 01:47:16 AM AST
ARE you kidding me... A nice man... I know plenty of suposed "NICE" people and they like to touch young kids!!!! Are you for REAL?????????????? Nice people dont put themselves in a situation where they are going to kiss a 16 year old kid. NICE people know the difference between right and wrong. NICE or not it doesnt matter........... what matters is he was wrong and he should just admit it and move on with his life. If he was such a nice person he would admit what is wrong and save this kid from getting on the stand. I too knew Staples when I was a child. Seemed a bit off but who isnt. I have heard the rumors that are flooting around about what Staples is saying about this kid... OF course he is going to make this kid out to be the bad guy what else would you expect. Typical perverts always make it seem like the kid hit on them. God this whole this is stupid. I hope he gets what is coming to him!!! COME on law stick up for a kid for once!!!
6
Thumbs Up
17
Thumbs Down
Lesley O'Leary, Fredericton on 24/11/08 06:02:53 PM AST
I think anybody who knows Mr. Staples or the "victim" personally, and know the details of the situation understand perfectly what actually went on here. Mr. Staples had a lapse in judgment but he IS a good man and the boy here is a scheming twisted individual with a lot of issues. I am personally more concerned that the law stick up for the innocent children sexually abused in the teens child pornography collection. I hope the trial goes well for Mr. Staples and send my comfort out to him, his boyfriend and his family during this difficult time.
12
Thumbs Up
4
Thumbs Down
N. T., Fredericton on 24/11/08 06:41:11 PM AST
The problem is that the people who know him are the ones sticking up for him. The main issue is that you cannot open your eyes and see that it doesnt matter is this kid needs help or not. He was wrong and you guys are trying to sweep this all under the table. Lapse in judgement I really think it is a bit more serious then that. Why dont we do what always happens and sweep it under the rug and pretend it never happened. YEA right... I am glad he will have to live with this all his life!!!!!!
6
Thumbs Up
9
Thumbs Down
Lesley O'Leary, Fredericton on 24/11/08 07:03:55 PM AST
This makes me livid! Even this short article makes it clear who is the good man and who is the troublemaking skank. I am a close friend of John and Ken and theirs is a deeply loving and time-tested relationship. John is a psychology student with experience in social work and live-in caretaking for the disabled. He has such a big heart. When this "boy" reached out to him, he went so far out of his way to help as to sacrifice his own living space, and how does the little turd repay him? Coming on to his boyfriend, coming on to him, then pressing charges! John had the good conscience to fess up to a kiss, which could have been nothing more than a simple peck (John and I have kissed that way), to his wounded boyfriend (and knowing Ken, I'm sure he felt hurt for more than "a second"); meanwhile, the "boy" has child porn on his computer!

And to say "send him off to a womens prison, Sending him to a male prison would be rewarding him" is disgustingly ignorant.
16
Thumbs Up
6
Thumbs Down
Em M., Fredericton on 24/11/08 07:26:18 PM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles