Teacher assistant faces allegation of touching teen

Published Wednesday November 19th, 2008
A1

School District 18 officials testified Tuesday that a former Leo Hayes High School teacher assistant facing a sex-crime allegation involving a student was in a position of responsibility over students.

Jonathan Samuel Staples, 35, of Zealand was in provincial court Tuesday to stand trial on a charge that he touched a young person sexually between April 1-30, 2007, while he was in a position of trust or authority over that young person.

Leo Hayes principal Kevin Pottle testified the student in question and the boy's mother came to him May 24, 2007, to report some concerns about Staples, who was working as a teacher assistant at the high school at the time.

Based on that conversation, he said, he contacted the city police and Karen Morton, the district's director of human resources.

After a meeting later that afternoon between Staples, himself and Morton, Pottle said, Staples was "reassigned to home."

Morton said she "advised him his services were no longer required."

Pottle said while teachers and teacher assistants (TAs) have different responsibilities, TAs and other school employees as well as volunteers do have responsibilities to students, as outlined in District 18's Policy 701.

That policy governs student protection and safety, and it outlines what constitutes abuse and misconduct toward students.

That includes: "behaviour of a sexual nature with pupils such as: making or accepting sexual advances or invitations, asking for a date, touching inappropriately or having sexual relationship; (or) behaviour which is considered physical, sexual, or emotional abuse or neglect of a child whether or not the child is a pupil in the public school system," the policy states.

Morton said all those applying for jobs with the school district have to fill out a questionnaire on the principles and rules listed in Policy 701.

She produced the questionnaire that Staples had filled out, which was entered as an exhibit with the court.

Leo Hayes vice-principal Nathalie Capson-Daniels said that as adults in the school system, teacher assistants definitely have responsibilities to the students.

"Obviously, they're in a position of authority over students," she testified Tuesday.

All the school officials testified it doesn't appear as though Staples served as a TA with any class of which the complainant was a member.

Ken Sprague, 29, Staples's boyfriend of more than five years, testified that the student called Staples on a Sunday night in April 2007 looking for a place to stay, either because he'd been kicked out of his home or he stormed out.

Sprague said it would be OK for the teenager to stay at his place, as his parents were away for the night. Staples drove to pick the boy up, he said.

After the student had arrived at Sprague's residence, he said, the boy made a pass at him when they were alone at one point.

"He started coming on to me," Sprague said, noting he rejected those advances.

"Eventually, he leaned in and tried to kiss me."

Later that evening, he, Staples and the student were all just hanging out and talking on Sprague's bed.

Sprague said when it was time for bed, the student didn't want to leave the room to go to sleep in a separate room that had been set up for him.

"He was really resistant. He kept trying to talk us into letting him stay," he said.

In the following weeks, Sprague said, he communicated with the boy online.

He said the teen wanted to meet him alone to talk about something in person, and when Staples learned of that, the accused admitted to his boyfriend he and the boy had kissed.

"He said it had only happened once ... I was angry, only for a second," Sprague said.

Later, the boy told Sprague the intimate contact between him and Staples had gone much further than just kissing.

Leo Hayes teacher Brenda Cameron testified she saw Staples and the boy arrive together on school grounds one day.

She said the boy didn't seem upset or in distress as he got out of Staples's car.

RCMP forensic computer analyst Payman Hakimian testified that he recovered 22 relevant MSN Messenger chat logs from the student's computer.

Those chats were between the student and Staples, him and Sprague, and between him and another individual.

Hakimian said he also examined Staples's cellphone and thumb drive.

He found that the student was listed on the cellphone directory and there was a record of calls between Staples's phone and the teenager's phone.

Hakimian said his examination of the boy's computer also led to the discovery of some images that constituted child pornography.

When defence lawyer Edward Derrah asked him if the boy had been charged as a result of that discovery, Hakimian said he didn't know, noting such decisions are left to police officers and prosecutors.

The trial continues Nov. 25, at which time the teenage complainant is scheduled to testify.

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (49)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

John is a very good man, and all of these homophobic comments are ridiculous. Yes, John may be a homosexual, but that doesn't change the wonderful man that he is. Yes I agree, what MAY have happened is wrong, but like John himself stated on here, barely anyone knows the actual details of the case, including myself, I don't, but I know John, and whatever he did to help this "boy" was with good intentions and from the heart of gold that he has.

Also, there is nothing wrong with Zealand, I'm not from Zealand, but I know people who are and the biggest majority of them are great people as well.

Needless to say, people should quit passing judgements on John before knowing all of the details of this case, and without even knowing him. Judging his character is wrong when half of you probably wouldn't even know him to see him.

I can only hope for the best for you John, and that everything works out. I'm sorry your reputation got ruined for a good deed that you tried to do.
13
Thumbs Up
3
Thumbs Down
Anonymous ..., Fredericton on 25/11/08 02:07:43 PM AST
My comments have nothing to do with homophobics Anonymous they are all based on the adult taking advantage of the child and yes he is still a child. So don't sidetrack the issue here! I'd be saying the same if it was a hetrosexual man and a female student! don't hide behind the gay bashing crap!It is too east to go off on that track!
5
Thumbs Up
7
Thumbs Down
Does it Matter Not much, Fredericton on 25/11/08 03:27:52 PM AST
I agree with Does it matter not much... Nobody cares if he is Gay or not in this day and age who cares... Why is it that if someone is gay they always turn it around saying you are only saying bad things about me because i am GAY...Gay or not what he did was wrong. sound like a broken record...thats becasue i am...
6
Thumbs Up
10
Thumbs Down
Lesley O'Leary, Fredericton on 25/11/08 03:31:13 PM AST
I was not saying it was either of you two saying anything about him being gay, I am talking about previous posts, impeticular the first one about sending him to a women's jail, that's just ignorant, and the many other posts about it. Plus the fact of him being a homosexual was not the point of my post, I was just voicing my opinion about some of the comments made towards the fact that he is gay.
5
Thumbs Up
5
Thumbs Down
Anonymous ..., Fredericton on 25/11/08 03:33:15 PM AST
And you have every right.
3
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Does it Matter Not much, Fredericton on 25/11/08 03:38:52 PM AST
It's getting old watching people judge based on headliner details and gaps filled in with assumptions. Shrilling that John exploited his position of authority is B.S. John didn't know when they first met that the poor "victim" was student, and not even one that John worked with at that. As it happens, the very same policy could be used to charge a 19 yr-old janitor dating a 17 yr-old student, or a TA whose spouse returned to school to finish a degree. This is only a story because John worked for the school board, with *other* students.

But because of one mistake he made with a spurned, vindictive accuser-- someone who wasn't harmed, who instigated the relationship with a naive older man, who consented to kissing and is lying about the rest, who then tried to ruin our relationship for his own jealous purpose, and who only complained when he didn't get his way-- John is being publicly vilified. His life and character reduced to one transgression against the letter of the law.
5
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Ken S., Fredericton on 25/11/08 08:44:18 PM AST
The moral panic here is because of the taboos of sex, the way it's fetishised, the rules invented around it. A 33 year-old kissing a 16 year-old-- outrageous! The older must be a deviant, the younger *must* be the victim! Even though marriages and affairs with wider age differences are not uncommon. Even though the line between "child" and "adult" or "proper" and "improper" can move with a vote or a decree. But still, let The Law at the moment command our outrage, and let's condemn the 'pervert.' This isn't about ditching the law, but about executing it sensibly and compassionately, considerate of case-by-case context, reproaching without smearing those who are otherwise good.

Or shall we pillory everyone who speeds by 5 kilometers whether there's an accident or not? Ruin the reputation of everyone who litters? Brand "monsters" everyone who parks illegally? Because those are laws, too, written blind to context. To those judging: what are your own crimes, and how shall we judge you?
3
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Ken S., Fredericton on 25/11/08 08:44:42 PM AST
I too have known John my entire life. I in fact had him many times be in a position of trust over me as a young teenager. He in fact has been a very close family friend and has always gone out of his way to help me and anyone he calls a friend. In saying that John has never in the entire time I have known him exhibited any signs of someone who would take advantage of someone. If any of you people that are so quick to point the finger even spent 5 minutes with this man then you would also know who he is and how much of a heart he has for people.

I am one of the most Conservative people you will ever meet and am someone who would support the execution of child molesters and fellow citizens that is something that John is definitely not or will ever be.

I say charge the kid with the child porn and actually get someone who is exploiting children.
8
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Justin C, Fredericton on 25/11/08 08:52:35 PM AST
I meant to say and that is something is definitly not or will ever be (a molester, someone who takes advantage of people etc)
3
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Justin C, Fredericton on 25/11/08 08:54:25 PM AST
also what ever happend to innocent until proven guilty? I would to think that as a teacher that any student could just accuse me of something and then the entire public rally against me despite the fact that I would be innocent. this is what we have courts for people.
9
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Justin C, Fredericton on 25/11/08 09:29:13 PM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles