It's out with the 'Old' at Government House

Published Friday January 2nd, 2009

Name change | Historic building goes back to past

A1

Lt.-Gov. Hermenegilde Chiasson decided New Year's Day was the perfect time to be out with the 'Old.'

1 of 2
Click to Enlarge
Click to Enlarge
CELEBratiON: Michelle Daigle, left, hams it up for the photographer as Don Rigley looks on. They were playing at Government house on new Year's Day.

The Queen's representative in New Brunswick issued an official proclamation Thursday restoring the original name of Government House.

Chiasson made the announcement as part of his annual New Year's Day public levee.

"It used to make sense to call it Old Government House when the RCMP had their headquarters here," he said. "But now it has become what it used to be. It is a residence of the governor.''

Chiasson said the word "old" has a certain connotation to it.

It makes sense to change the name since the residence resumed its service to lieutenant-governors a decade ago, Chiasson said.

"It has become a place for the people and a source of community pride," Chiasson said.

He noted that the home is a gathering place not only for the levee, but also on New Brunswick Day, as well as annually hosting hundreds of events and thousands of visitors.

Provinces such as Saskatchewan and British Columbia have a similar residence. In those places, he said, they are simply known as Government House.

Chiasson said he thought it was also important to rename the building because the site has great significance to the province's First Nations, Acadians and Loyalists, especially in the year that Fredericton has been designated one of Canada's cultural capitals.

Constructed from 1826-1828, the mansion was built as a residence for New Brunswick's governors and lieutenant-governors.

Until Confederation, most of the important decisions affecting the province were debated in the building.

Between Confederation and 1996, the building served a number of purposes.

From 1896 to 1900, it was a school for hearing impaired students.

It was a military barracks during the First World War and later a hospital for returning soldiers after the war.

From 1934 to 1988, the building was the headquarters of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in New Brunswick.

In 1999, Government House again became the home to New Brunswick's lieutenant-governors.

Karen Sullenger, a U.S.-born professor of science education at the University of New Brunswick who was making her first visit to Government House as part of Thursday's levee, said she loved the sense of history she got from being in the building.

"You feel that this was a buzzing place," she said, noting it was like a window on history. "This building represents the heritage of New Brunswick."

She thinks restoring heritage buildings such as Government House is a good way to go.

"We have to look at it in a new way. Old is new."

Huguette Smyth, an Edmundston writer who travelled to Fredericton for the levee, said the name change is good move.

"You just have to look at all that is going on here," she said, speaking in French, "to see there is nothing old about it."

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (3)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

Who pays for this historic residence? It must be a horror to heat. What do we need a queen's representative for-she has nothing to do with Canada- & it seems like a huge waste of tax money to support this post & the associated expenses.
Isn't the very idea of a "Royal" family highly discriminatory? Promoting class distinction to people of this family because of who their parents were? Giving them & their selected "buddies" an elevated status, plus an income to promote this? Are we really in 2009 maintaining this concept? The current queen had nothing to do with building up this country,initiated centuries ago by the slaughter of natives & exploitation of natural resources to enrich the coffers of European rulers.To continue to sponge off citizens for a frivilous,luxurious lifestyle seems like a form of high class welfare for parasitic, self indulgent inbreds with a strong sense of inherent entitlement,brought on by breeding rather than special skills, knowledge or talent.Shame
5
Thumbs Up
31
Thumbs Down
b nikiba, moncton on 02/01/09 10:50:01 AM AST
It's a good thing that not all people feel the way that "b nikiba" does. We have to have reminders of our past to put us on the road to the future. Be it a restoration of a building or some other form of remembering the past,we should not always put the emphasis on "cost". Where would we be if we had nothing to show our history. There really should be more restorations of historic sites,buildings etc.instead of just tearing something down for the sake of building a parking lot,an off ramp or a state of the art building that looks cold and uninviting. If people of other countries thought of just replacing buildings and other things,there would be no Pyramids,no Big Ben or other great structures. We may not have seen these great things in person but learned of them over the years as will our children and grandchildren. If all of our historic buildings disappear we will be the losers. As for the Queen-she and all royalty are a part of our culture and heritage and should remain as such.
17
Thumbs Up
6
Thumbs Down
G. Doherty, Minto on 02/01/09 03:01:48 PM AST
It is important to remember who we are and where we came from, however, the queen is part of the culture and heritage of only a small part of Canadian society and should be removed from the Canadian political structure. The time has come for Canada to stop being subservient to some foreign family. The idea that heredity should determine who is our head of state is archaic. Let's have a head of state that is a Canadian citizen, and represents the Canadian people.
As for historic sites and buildings ... maintain them, and renovate them. They are too beautiful and important to our history to let go.
7
Thumbs Up
17
Thumbs Down
Seamus O'Malley, ... on 02/01/09 10:12:46 PM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles