Fighting the legacy of Agent Orange

Published Tuesday January 27th, 2009

Compensation | Battle continues for some affected by spraying

A1

Rejection isn't something that Barb Gill or Bob Pardy is willing to accept.

Click to Enlarge
STEPHEN MACGILLIVRAY PHOTO
DIARY RECORD: Barb gill is shown with her childhood diaries from 1963 to June 1966. She said the diaries show she was in the area affected by the spraying of Agent Orange.

The Fredericton woman and Moncton man are two of the more than 800 Canadians who haven't qualified for the federal government's Agent Orange compensation program.

But both have pledged to continue the fight because they feel it's something they deserve.

Gill, who's recovering from her second battle with liposarcoma, a malignant tumour condition, was on her grandfather's farm in Maugerville when Agent Orange was first tested at Canadian Forces Base Gagetown in the mid-1960s.

Gill has had her application for the $20,000 ex gratia payment turned down three times.

"I haven't had the official word of being turned down the fourth time," she said. "I'll persevere. I am not done yet. I can't let it drain me emotionally, because if it does, that will affect my body."

The federal government announced a $95.6-million compensation package in 2007 for veterans and civilians affected by the U.S. military's spraying of Agent Orange at Gagetown.

To be eligible for the one-time, tax-free, ex gratia payment, individuals must have been diagnosed with a condition associated with Agent Orange, as determined by the U.S. National Academy of Sciences' Institute of Medicine.

They include afflictions such as Hodgkin's disease, prostate cancer, lymphoma, respiratory cancers and Type 2 diabetes.

They also must have worked or trained at Canadian Forces Base Gagetown, or lived in a community any part of which is within five kilometres of the base when Agent Orange was tested by the U.S. military in 1966 and 1967.

Gill, who also suffers from other illnesses, said her grandfather's farm fell within the five-kilometre boundary.

"It's hard to believe that something like this could have happened to us," Gill said. "It's almost unthinkable that there could have been so much poison and it could have affected my life so significantly."

Pardy, a 25-year veteran of the Forces, has also been told no.

"I was there," said Pardy. "I was there only in '66 - in July only."

Pardy, a retired sergeant, said he was posted to Germany at the time but came back to the Gagetown area for a month to get married - the same time the first spraying occurred.

"I sent all of this to Veterans Affairs, including a photocopy of my marriage certificate, showing I was in the area at the time."

Pardy, who has prostate cancer, diabetes and skin cancer, said he resided at a friend's house during the stay. The house fell within the five-kilometre requirement.

He said he also sent Veterans Affairs a document signed by a friend who backed up his story.

"Having given them all of this, they still deny it."

Pardy said his two stepsons - children at the time of the spraying - were both awarded the ex gratia payment with no hassle.

"I am losing my confidence, yes," Pardy said. "But I am not going to go down without a fight."

Pardy is also seeking a pension.

As of Jan. 12, 3,000 applications had been received by Veterans Affairs Canada for the ex gratia payment.

Of those who have applied, 1,959 applications have been approved and 1,938 cheques have been issued.

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (4)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

The Canadian flag should be flown at half-mast and upside down from coast to coast over this.

Our government allowed the USA to test chemical weapons in a heavily populated area repeatedly and then kept it a secret so we wouldn't know what was causing the birth defects, diseases and our own deaths. Now they deny even this; it wasn't just 1966 and 1967.

How many hundreds of millions of dollars have these catastrophic decisions cost us so far? For the cover-up, I mean. Let's leave out what this has meant in terms of health care and funeral costs for the victims. Faked statistics and "panels of experts" don't come cheap. The level of corruption indicated here is staggering, because it reaches right into the Prime Minister's Office.

If the deliberate contamination of Canadians with the deadliest substance known doesn't warrant an Inquiry, what in hell does?
15
Thumbs Up
4
Thumbs Down
Kelly Franklin, Nanaimo on 27/01/09 09:43:49 AM AST
The study that the government did to look at the spraying at CFB Gagetown cost 10 million dollars.

In 1964 over spraying of defoliants killed the produce that was being grown on the other side of the river opposite of Oromocto. The farmers of the area received $250,000 in compensation in 1964. In today's dollars that millions of dollars. If the defoliant can do that much damage to the plants what about all of that chemical that was washed down the river?

The government will continue to hide for as long as possible and hope all of our voices will die before they are held accountable.

I strongly encourage all of you to join the class action Law suit put forth by Tony Merchant. The only way you will get justice and perhaps compensation is to see this case make it to the court system. Don't let a politician decide let a judge decide your fate!
Call now (888) 567-7777

Or call me if you need some help.

10
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
Darren Brumwell, Geary on 27/01/09 10:20:31 AM AST
Excellent comment and research, Mr. Brumwell.

There were at least three of these incidents: 1964, 1972 and 1988.
The 1988 "unavoidable, freak accident" spread vapor drift and resulted in 65 claims of damage to homeowners and market crops. That one cost $358,000 in claims. The area affected is not stated but this too had to be miles away.
I also have a map showing they sprayed Agent Orange just a few blocks from our house in Oromocto in the early 60's. Yet our "compassionate" government concluded that anyone beyond 800 meters from the path of the sprayplanes COULD NOT HAVE BEEN AFFECTED.

I'll contact you later today.
Kelly
8
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
Kelly Franklin, Nanaimo on 27/01/09 11:26:09 AM AST
What your readers and the people being turned down must remember is that the causality rate is getting dangerously close to fifty percent (50%) and this is purposely not counting the already deceased so the figure could be as high as a 75% causality rate... for seven days of US spraying.

Ottawa want Canada and the other 426,000 possible victims of Gagetown to believe that when the USA sprays 2 and 1/2 barrels of a 50/50 mix of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T for all of 7 days that there is a 75% + causality rate but when Ottawa sprays 6,000 barrels and an additional 2 million pounds of identical chemicals, for more then 28 years... no one could possibly be harmed. LOL If you believe that... do you guys want to buy the Eifel Tower or the Brooklyn Bridge... Real Cheep


Cpl. Kenneth H. Young CD (ret)
18
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Kenneth Young, Nanaimo on 28/01/09 10:49:13 PM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles