Remains found in woods near Moncton that of a porpoise, not a dog left to die

Published Saturday November 21st, 2009
A6

MONCTON - Turns out Rover's OK. Flipper, not so much.

Skeletal remains found by hunters in a cage in the woods last weekend are that of a porpoise and not a dog as initially believed.

Naturalist Mary Majka said Friday she found the porpoise carcass in the Shepody River and placed it in the cage so it would decompose into a skeleton for the New Brunswick Museum.

"It's going to be a museum specimen," she said.

Two hunters stumbled across the remains last weekend and told the Moncton Times and Transcript this week that they thought they were that of a dog someone had left to die.

But Majka said she and her son, David Christie, a former curator at the New Brunswick Museum, placed the carcass in the cage to keep scavengers away while it decomposed.

The newspaper story angered many readers, including one who was in tears when she called Majka to talk about it Thursday.

"Some people have gotten very upset about it," she said. "But it was us who left it there."

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (4)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

Perhaps a notice attached to the cage explaining its PORPOISE would have prevented this situation.
15
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Bear Grizzly, Fredericton on 21/11/09 09:30:21 AM AST
Perhaps not running to the media with everything would have prevented this situation.
3
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Omemee With Love, Shh! on 21/11/09 10:50:17 PM AST
Perhaps the hunters shouldn't have been on private property in the first place...
5
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Anon Nimity, Fredericton on 22/11/09 09:38:03 AM AST
Anon nimity What makes you think they were on private property. The artical doesn't say they the hunters were on private property.
0
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
I Love My Dog, Fredericton on 22/11/09 09:13:31 PM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles